Solana Coin priceSolana

A new video shared on X by crypto enthusiast Xaif carried a message that cut against the prevailing fatigue in digital asset markets. The clip featured comments from John Gillen, a former BlackRock vice president, speaking about ETF flows, investor psychology, and systemic stress. Many market participants have grown impatient after months without a decisive rally despite strong ETF performance. Xaif presented the video as evidence that sentiment at the institutional level may be changing, even if price action has not yet reflected it. Xaif drew attention to the fact that an XRP ETF had already crossed $1 billion in volume. He emphasized that these assets are active and described the current sentiment as capitulation rather than extinction. 🚨 XRP ETF SIGNAL 🚨 Now it feels like they finally understand the flippening is happening. An $XRP ETF has already crossed $1B+ in volume.These assets aren’t dead.This is capitulation, not extinction. pic.twitter.com/otqxdKrUKS — Xaif Crypto🇮🇳|🇺🇸 (@Xaif_Crypto) December 20, 2025 ETF Volume Counters the Capitulation Narrative In the video, Gillen addressed the exhaustion visible across the market. “It exhausts a lot of people,” he said. He then pointed to the continued demand for crypto exchange-traded products. He noted “strong inflows into the Solana ETFs” and said, “There’s an XRP ETF that I think has done over a billion dollars of volume.” Volume at that scale signals engagement, not abandonment. Gillen reinforced that view with a clear assessment. “There is still a market for these things,” he said. He rejected the idea that major digital assets have lost relevance. The contrast between strong ETF activity and weak price momentum shaped the core argument. Gillen characterized the current mood as emotional rather than structural. He described it as “a capitulation from frustration” tied to the absence of a major price pump. XRP in Focus as Patience Replaces Hype XRP emerged as a focal point because of its ETF activity. The $1 billion trading volume suggests that XRP attracts attention from institutions. Gillen’s remarks supported that interpretation. He did not single out XRP for criticism. He cited it as an example of continued engagement during a period of low enthusiasm. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 XRP ETFs have made significant progress, and that distinction matters. Capitulation implies selling driven by fatigue, not by a collapse in the underlying thesis. ETF volume provides a measurable signal that interest persists even as optimism fades. Where Does XRP Go From Here? Gillen also tied his outlook to macro conditions. He said his thesis has “always been that eventually something is gonna break in the system.” He pointed to uncertainty around the private credit market or the housing market. He did not predict timing, but emphasized that pressure continues to build. For XRP, volume and interest have persisted, and while the asset has not experienced a massive pump, the journey isn’t over yet. Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

XRP ETFs have surpassed $1B in assets under management, driven by the token’s long-standing familiarity among traditional investors and its strong multi-year performance. Executives point to XRP’s brand recognition, deep liquidity, and simple exposure as key reasons behind the steady ETF inflows. This comes at a time when other crypto ETFs struggle to hold demand. The milestone has pulled XRP price prediction models back into focus as capital increasingly rotates toward regulated crypto exposure. DeepSnitch AI enters this discussion as traders seek tools to interpret where attention and liquidity move during ETF-driven market changes. Momentum continues to build as the presale moves toward the $1M mark. Visible development progress and ongoing listing speculation are keeping DeepSnitch AI firmly on trader watchlists going into 2026. Institutional demand changes XRP narratives Executives point to familiarity as a key driver behind XRP’s ETF success. XRP’s long track record and recognizable use case have made it easier for traditional investors to gain exposure, which has accelerated XRP institutional adoption within regulated investment products. XRP’s performance over the past three to four years has also played a role in changing sentiment. Spot XRP ETFs have now recorded hundreds of millions in net inflows, placing XRP among the most successful altcoin ETF launches to date. DeepSnitch AI becomes relevant in this environment because ETF inflows often trigger uneven reactions across tokens and narratives. Analysts are impressed by the utility so far, which is why they’ve given DeepSnitch AI a chance of a 100x return. DeepSnitch AI: Offering big asymmetric upside DeepSnitch AI is an early-stage project that is already showing tangible trader-facing utility. Many presales spend months promoting roadmaps without delivering visible products. The DeepSnitch AI dev team regularly provides updates so users can see how they are progressing. This transparency is rare in the current presale environment. The two security audits add even further credibility. Investors feel more confident about putting their money into an early-stage project when it can show this level of credibility. The key advantage DeepSnitch AI offers over XRP price prediction narratives is asymmetric upside. You won’t ever get 100x returns with XRP due to its $113B market cap. However, DeepSnitch AI is available for $0.0903 currently. This creates a window where smaller allocations carry disproportionate upside ahead of a public market launch. Rumors of a Tier-1 listing add even more weight to this argument. The DeepSnitch AI team is going a step further in looking after early holders during December. Anyone who spends at least $2,000 with the code DSNTVIP50 can get a 50% boost to their allocation. DSNTVIP100 will double your tokens with a $5,000+ payment. DeepSnitch AI’s community approach is clearly paying off. The presale is already over the $850K mark, and the momentum doesn’t look like stopping anytime soon. Added to that are the clear use cases and the rumors of a major listing. That’s why analysts believe a 100x run could be in the future for DeepSnitch AI. ⚠️🚨 DeepSnitch AI Official Warning: Don’t Fall for Fake Websites!🚫 XRP price prediction: Quick gains appear achievable XRP continues to trade within a defined range as ETF inflows provide structural support. XRP technical analysis shows consolidation after strong multi-year gains. This type of pattern is often associated with accumulation. Analysts see room for a return to $3.50 levels in the coming weeks if ETF inflows remain consistent and broader market conditions begin to stabilize: Updated XRP price prediction models question if sustained ETF demand is able to offset wider market volatility. More regulatory stability and continued ETF inflows could see a run towards $4.00 by mid-2026. The broader Ripple ecosystem outlook of ongoing development and notable cross-border payment initiatives maintains XRP’s long-term relevance. Solana: Growing institutional interest Solana is also seeing growing interest as traditional investors gain clarity on its application layer, fee structure, and user activity. SOL ETFs have gathered $119M in net inflows so far in December, which shows a notable uptick in institutional interest. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong also publicly endorsed Solana this week, with Solana DEX trading now available on the exchange. Exchange integrations and rising institutional interest continue to strengthen Solana’s medium-term outlook. A path back to $250 is possible from the current $125 levels in the coming months. Final verdict: Bullish signals for XRP XRP’s ETF milestone highlights how familiarity and accessibility drive institutional flows. XRP price prediction models have adjusted quickly following the ETF milestone. DeepSnitch AI is also getting plenty of attention as its presale continues to heat up. Then there’s the impressive utility, Tier-1 listing rumors, and meme coin energy to contend with. These factors add up to a 100x forecast from analysts. Take part in the DeepSnitch AI presale today before the next price rise. Follow the project’s X and Telegram pages for frequent updates. FAQs Can beginners use DeepSnitch AI effectively? Yes. The test dashboard and AI snitches are designed to be accessible, allowing newer traders to interpret market context without needing advanced technical knowledge. What makes DeepSnitch AI different from other AI crypto projects? Most AI tokens focus on infrastructure or compute resources. DeepSnitch AI instead targets trader-facing utility, aiming to make market interpretation simpler and more accessible. Does DeepSnitch AI track ETF flows directly? No. DeepSnitch AI does not pull ETF data or execute trades. Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is part of a sponsored post, press release, or paid content and is for promotional purposes only. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and exercise caution before making any decisions based on the content. Coinomedia does not endorse, guarantee, or take responsibility for the accuracy or reliability of the information, products, or services mentioned and will not be liable for any losses or damages incurred. Tags DeepSnitchAI PressRelease

When a network brags about throughput, it’s really bragging about how much chaos it can swallow before it chokes. That’s why the most interesting part of Solana’s latest “stress test” is that there’s no story at all. A delivery network called Pipe published data that put a recent barrage against Solana at roughly 6 terabits per second, and Solana’s co-founders backed the broad thrust of it in public posts. If the number is right, it’s the kind of traffic volume usually reserved for the internet’s biggest targets, the sort of thing Cloudflare writes long blog posts about because it isn’t supposed to be normal. And yet Solana kept producing blocks. There was no coordinated restart or validator-wide group chat turning into a late-night disaster movie. CryptoSlate’s own reporting on the incident said block production remained steady and confirmations kept moving, with no meaningful jump in user fees. There was even a counterpoint tucked into the chatter: SolanaFloor noted that an Anza contributor argued the 6 Tbps number was a short peak burst rather than a constant week-long wall of traffic, which matters because “peak” can be both true and slightly theatrical. That kind of nuance is fine. In real-world denial-of-service, the peak is often the point, because a short punch can still knock over a system tuned for a steady state. Cloudflare’s threat reporting points out how many large attacks end quickly, sometimes too quickly for humans to react, which is why modern defense is supposed to be automatic. Solana’s latest incident now shows a network that learned how to make spam boring. What kind of attack was this, and what do attackers actually want? A DDoS is the internet’s crudest but most effective weapon: overwhelm a target’s normal traffic by flooding it with junk traffic from many machines at once. Cloudflare’s definition is blunt; it’s a malicious attempt to disrupt normal traffic by overwhelming the target or nearby infrastructure with a flood of internet traffic, typically sourced from compromised systems. That’s the web2 version, and it’s the version Pipe is gesturing at with a terabits-per-second chart. Crypto networks add a second, more crypto-native flavor on top: spam that isn’t “junk packets at a website” so much as “endless transactions at a chain,” often because there’s money on the other side of congestion. Solana’s own outage history is like a handbook for that incentive problem. In September 2021, the chain went offline for more than 17 hours, and Solana’s early postmortem framed the flood of bot-driven transactions as, in effect, a denial-of-service event tied to a Raydium-hosted IDO. In April 2022, Solana’s official outage report described an even more intense wall of inbound transactions, 6 million per second, with individual nodes seeing more than 100 Gbps. The report said there was no evidence of a classic denial-of-service campaign, and that the fingerprints looked like bots trying to win an NFT mint where the first caller gets the prize. The network stopped producing blocks that day and had to coordinate a restart. So what do attackers want, besides attention and the joy of ruining everyone’s Sunday? Sometimes it’s straightforward extortion: pay us, or we keep the firehose on. Sometimes it’s reputational damage, because a chain that can’t stay live can’t credibly host the kind of apps people want to build. Sometimes it’s market gamesmanship, where broken UX creates odd pricing, delayed liquidations, and forced reroutes that reward people positioned for disorder. In the on-chain spam version, the goal can be direct: win the mint, win the trade, win the liquidation, win the block space. What’s different now is that Solana has built more ways to refuse the invitation. The design changes that kept Solana running Solana became better at staying online by changing where the pain shows up. In 2022, failures had a familiar shape: too many inbound requests, too much node-level resource strain, too little ability to slow bad actors, and knock-on effects that turned congestion into liveness problems. The upgrades that matter most sit at the edge of the network, where traffic hits validators and leaders. One is the transition to QUIC for network communication, which Solana later listed as part of its stability work, alongside local fee markets and stake-weighted quality of service. QUIC isn’t magic, but it’s built for controlled, multiplexed connections rather than the older connection patterns that make abuse cheap. More importantly, Solana’s validator-side documentation describes how QUIC is used inside the Transaction Processing Unit path: limits on concurrent QUIC connections per client identity, limits on concurrent streams per connection, and limits that scale with the sender’s stake. It also describes packets-per-second rate limiting applied based on stake, and notes the server can drop streams with a throttling code, with clients expected to back off. That turns “spam” into “spam that gets shoved into the slow lane.” It’s no longer enough to have bandwidth and a botnet, because now you need privileged access to leader capacity, or you’re competing for a narrower slice of it. Solana’s developer guide for stake-weighted QoS spells this out: with the feature enabled, a validator holding 1% of stake has the right to transmit up to 1% of the packets to the leader. That stops low-stake senders from flooding out everyone else and raises Sybil resistance. In other words, stake becomes a kind of bandwidth claim, not just voting weight. Then there’s the fee side, which is where Solana tries to avoid “one noisy app ruins the whole city.” Local fee markets and priority fees give users a way to compete for execution without turning every busy moment into a chain-wide auction. Solana’s fee documentation explains how priority fees work through compute units, with users able to set a compute unit limit and an optional compute unit price, which acts like a tip to encourage prioritization. It also notes a practical gotcha: the priority fee is based on the requested compute unit limit, not the compute actually used, so sloppy settings can mean paying for unused headroom. That prices computationally heavy behavior and gives the network a knob to make abuse more expensive where it hurts. Put those pieces together, and you get a different failure mode. Instead of a flood of inbound noise pushing nodes into memory death spirals, the network has more ways to throttle, prioritize, and contain. Solana itself, looking back at the 2022 era, framed QUIC, local fee markets, and stake-weighted QoS as concrete steps taken to keep reliability from being sacrificed for speed. That’s why a terabit-scale weekend can pass without real repercussions: the chain has more automatic “no’s” at the front door and more ways to keep the line moving for users who aren’t trying to break it. None of this means Solana is immune to ugly days. Even people cheering the 6 Tbps anecdote argue about what the number means and how long it lasted, which is a polite way of saying internet measurements are messy and bragging rights don’t come with an audit report. And the trade-offs don’t vanish. A system that ties better traffic treatment to stake is, by design, friendlier to well-capitalized operators than hobbyist validators. A system that stays fast under load can still become a venue for bots that are willing to pay. Still, the fact that the network was quiet matters. Solana’s earlier outages weren’t “people noticed a little latency.” Block production ceased completely, followed by public restarts and long coordination windows, including the April 2022 halt that took hours to resolve. In contrast, this week’s story is that the chain remained live while traffic allegedly hit a scale more at home in Cloudflare’s threat reports than in crypto lore. Solana is behaving like a network that expects to be attacked and has decided the attacker should be the one who gets tired first. The post How Solana neutralized a 6 Tbps attack using a specific traffic-shaping protocol that makes spam impossible to scale appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin is back in focus after an outlook from Citigroup, where analysts mapped out a wide price range for the next year that captures both upside momentum and lingering downside risks. The bank’s latest projections point to a base-case target of $143,000 over the next 12 months, anchored in expectations around a growth in ETF participation and clearer regulatory frameworks. Furthermore, Citi outlined an optimistic path that stretches to $189,000, alongside a bearish scenario that projects a downward move to $78,500. Related Reading Banks Could Favor A Higher XRP Price, Finance Expert Says 16 hours ago ETF Adoption And Institutional Demand Citi’s base and bullish scenarios are built around the same core thesis: the growing role of regulated investment vehicles in shaping Bitcoin’s market structure. Crypto analysts are always noting that Spot Bitcoin ETFs have lowered barriers for institutional investors, making it easier for large pools of capital to gain exposure without direct custody concerns. Analysts at Citi are leaning into this school of thought and are projecting bullish price levels for Bitcoin. With the expectations of ETF interest and regulatory clarity in mind, Citi sees Bitcoin trending toward $143,000 under its base case within the next 12 months. Interestingly, the outlook of a bullish scenario from the analysts projected that Bitcoin will be trading somewhere around $189,000 within the next 12 months. These projections are notable considering the current state of Bitcoin’s price action, which is currently struggling near $90,000. They are also contingent on a turnaround in the state of flows surrounding Spot Bitcoin ETFs. LATEST: 📈 Citi analysts put Bitcoin’s 12-month price base case at $143,000, driven by anticipated ETF interest and regulatory clarity, with a bullish scenario of $189,000 and a bearish one of $78,500. pic.twitter.com/jAukEDkXQe — CoinMarketCap (@CoinMarketCap) December 20, 2025 Despite its constructive outlook, Citi also flagged downside risks that could derail bullish momentum. A bearish framework by Citi analysts projects the Bitcoin price sliding to $78,500 within the next 12 months. BTCUSD currently trading at $88,575. Chart: TradingView Fundstrat’s Internal View Contrasts With Citi’s Optimism Citi’s bullish projections are in contrast to a more cautious internal outlook recently reported by Fundstrat Global Advisors. Internal discussions within the firm are warning of a possible drawdown of the Bitcoin price toward the $60,000 to $65,000 range. According to an internal note circulated to clients, Fundstrat’s head of digital asset strategy, Sean Farrell, cautioned that a further correction may unfold during the first half of 2026 as macroeconomic pressures and tightening financial conditions weigh on risk assets. According to @_FORAB, Tom Lee’s fund, Fundstrat, stated in its latest 2026 cryptocurrency strategy advice to internal clients that a significant correction is expected in the first half of the year, completely contradicting Tom Lee’s public statements. The internal report sets… pic.twitter.com/HbRoNzr85z — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) December 20, 2025 The report outlined downside targets that place Bitcoin in the $60,000 to $65,000 range, a level that would represent a 30% decrease from its current price range. The same internal framework also projected Ethereum retreating downwards to $1,800 to $2,000, alongside Solana falling into a $50 to $75 range. Related Reading Bitcoin Feels The Weight Of Quantum Risk Concerns, Industry Leaders Warn 2 days ago This goes against the public stance of Fundstrat co-founder Tom Lee, who has publicly maintained a bullish stance on the long-term trajectory and new all-time highs for Ethereum and Bitcoin. Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView