Cena UniswapUNI

Story Highlights Uniswap activates its long-awaited fee switch, routing protocol fees to burn UNI tokens and directly tying network growth to token value for the first time. UNIfication restructures Uniswap under one roof, removes user-facing fees, and tests whether DeFi giants can finally convert usage into token value. Uniswap has entered a new chapter after its community overwhelmingly approved the long-awaited UNIfication proposal. The vote passed with near-unanimous backing, showing strong confidence in reshaping how value flows through the protocol. More than a governance tweak, the decision marks a shift toward tying Uniswap’s growth more directly to the UNI token itself. Advertisement --> At its core, the proposal reflects a belief that Uniswap has matured enough to move beyond experimentation and into a more sustainable, value-driven phase. Fee Switch Goes Live, UNI Burn Begins The biggest change under UNIfication is the activation of Uniswap’s long-discussed protocol fee switch. Until now, trading fees on Uniswap flowed entirely to liquidity providers. Going forward, a portion of those fees will be routed to the protocol and used to burn UNI tokens. This means Uniswap activity will now directly reduce UNI supply. As trading volume grows, more tokens are removed from circulation, reinforcing a long-term scarcity model. Net sequencer fees from Unichain will also be added to this burn mechanism, strengthening the link between protocol usage and token economics. After a mandatory two-day timelock, Uniswap will execute a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, an estimate of what could have been burned if the fee switch had existed from the start. Also Read : Cardano Founder Signals Major Midnight Push, Says 2026 “Is Not Ready” , Internal Restructuring Under Uniswap Labs Beyond token economics, UNIfication also simplifies Uniswap’s operations. Responsibilities previously split between the Uniswap Foundation and Uniswap Labs will now sit under a single roof. As part of the shift, Uniswap Labs will remove interface, wallet, and API fees, aiming to reduce friction for users and developers. A recurring UNI-funded growth budget has also been created to support long-term development rather than short-term incentives, signaling a more structured approach to protocol expansion. Community Reactions Are Split but Engaged Reaction across crypto has been lively. Crypto user Alexander described the move as a major moment for DeFi, arguing it creates a more level playing field. He noted that liquidity providers unwilling to share a portion of yields now have alternatives like Velodrome and Aerodrome, increasing competition across DeFi. Others were more skeptical. Another user pushed back on the excitement around token burns, arguing that uncirculated tokens have no real market value and burning them doesn’t meaningfully reduce dilution. In his view, the fee switch is the real story, not the burn headline. Meanwhile, guto.eth welcomed the change, calling it a defining test for DeFi. He argued that if protocols like Uniswap and Aave can’t turn major upgrades into real value reflected in token prices, the sector risks losing credibility. Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World! Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more. Subscribe to News FAQs What is the UNIfication proposal on Uniswap? UNIfication is a governance upgrade that activates Uniswap’s fee switch, links protocol revenue to UNI burns, and aligns growth more closely with the UNI token. How does Uniswap’s new fee switch work? A portion of trading fees now goes to the protocol instead of solely to liquidity providers, and those funds are used to permanently burn and reduce the circulating supply of UNI tokens. Why is UNIfication important for DeFi overall? It tests whether major DeFi protocols can convert real usage into sustainable token value, a key step for long-term credibility and growth. Tags Crypto news

🚨UNISWAP’S UNIFICATION PROPOSAL PASSES WITH OVERWHELMING SUPPORT The proposal activates the fee switch, removes frontend fees, and will burn 100M $UNI after 2-day timelock, cementing a deflationary model that permanently reduces supply.

TOP ALTCOINS TO WATCH (DEC 2025) 🔍 5 Coins Trending Right Now: 1️⃣ Hyperliquid (HYPE) — On-chain derivatives leader 2️⃣ Flare (FLR) — Smart data & DeFi expansion 3️⃣ Render (RNDR) — AI + decentralized GPU power 4️⃣ Uniswap (UNI) — DEX dominance 5️⃣ Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) — Growing utility narrative � Bitget ✨ Comment your fav & let’s watch together!$ETH

UNI traded near $5.90 as voters approved protocol fees and a large retroactive token burn. Uniswap’s fee switch ties trading volume to UNI supply cuts via an on-chain burn model. UNI price consolidated below $6.00 while futures open interest held above $377 million. UNI traded near $5.90–$5.92 on Dec. 26 after a 2.5% rise in the past 24 hours, as Uniswap voters backed a protocol fee switch and a large UNI token burn. The UNIfication proposal passed with more than 125 million votes in favor and 742 against, setting up a plan to route part of protocol revenues into an on-chain burn mechanism. UNI Price Trades Near $5.90 After a One-Week Rally UNI gained 13.84% over the past week, while the price swung between clear weekly extremes. The token printed a weekly low near $5.2009 on Dec. 20 and reached a peak around $6.25 on Dec. 21. After that push, the price cooled and moved into a tighter band near the $6 handle. However, the recent structure shows consolidation rather than a straight continuation move. Price held a base in the $5.75–$5.80 area during Dec. 24–26, while sellers defended overhead levels. As a result, UNI has traded below the prior $6.20–$6.25 rejection zone. Intraday action on Dec. 26 kept the same range tone. UNI posted an intraday high near $6.00–$6.02 and an intraday low near $5.74–$5.76, then rebounded toward $5.91. Moreover, price repeatedly stalled near $6.00, which kept that level in focus as near-term resistance. Derivatives activity has remained active during the current range. UNI futures open interest stood at $377.62 million on Dec. 25, while UNI traded near $5.80 in the same period. Earlier cycles saw open interest climb into the $600–$800 million range, so the market has cooled from peak leverage. Source: CoinGlass Price action also leaves clear technical markers for the next move. A sustained push above $6.00 would place $6.10 and the prior $6.25 high back on the radar. Conversely, a move under $5.88–$5.90 would turn focus toward $5.80, with $5.75 as the next line that traders often track. UNIfication Vote Backs the Fee Switch and UNI Token Burn Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation advanced the UNIfication proposal after a decisive governance vote. Uniswap founder Hayden Adams announced that the vote closed with 99.9% approval. The proposal aims to turn UNI from a governance-only token into an asset tied to protocol economics through fees and supply reduction. The measure activates the “fee switch,” which redirects a portion of trading fees to the protocol. Until now, Uniswap routed fees to liquidity providers, while UNI holders received governance rights only. Under the new framework, the protocol sends part of the fee stream to an on-chain mechanism designed to burn UNI. Additionally, the plan adds revenue from the Unichain sequencer to the burn flow after deducting L1 costs and Optimism allocations. The proposal also enters a two-day waiting period before execution steps begin. After that window, Uniswap plans to burn 100 million UNI from the treasury, worth over $590 million at current prices.Related: WLFI Slides Toward $0.11 Support as Bears Dominate: Bounce Ahead? Uniswap Fees, Daily Volume, and Supply Reduction Mechanics Uniswap averages about $2 billion in daily trading volume and generates roughly $600 million in annualized fees, according to DeFiLlama data. That scale has kept Uniswap at the top of decentralized exchange activity. At the same time, UNI’s value link to those fees remained indirect before the fee switch. Consequently, the new structure connects usage and fee generation to UNI supply changes. Higher protocol activity can increase the amount routed into the burn mechanism, while the circulating supply falls as burns occur. The proposal frames that link as a core feature of the updated token design. The package also reorganizes operations around Uniswap Labs. The plan moves Uniswap Foundation responsibilities to Uniswap Labs and ends interface fees. It also sets an annual development budget for wallets and API services funded by UNI tokens. Disclaimer: The information provided by CryptoTale is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any investment decisions. CryptoTale is not liable for any financial losses resulting from the use of the content. Tags Price Analysis Uniswap (UNI) News

The Aave DAO and community recently voted against a proposal to transfer brand ownership from Aave Labs to the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) governing the leading DeFi protocol. Prominent leaders like Aave Labs founder and CEO Stani and Marc Zeller, founder of the Aavechan Initiative, commented on the outcome, noting that voting achieved a record turnout. What Did Aave Users Vote Against? According to on-chain data, Coinspeaker retrieved from Snapshot, the “[ARFC] $AAVE token alignment. Phase 1 – Ownership” proposal closed on December 25. The Christmas vote saw a record 1.8 million AAVE users participate. 994,800 AAVE (55.29%) voted “NAY”, 741,600 AAVE (41.21%) chose to abstain, and only 63,000 (3.5%) voted in favor of the proposal. --> “[ARFC] $AAVE token alignment. Phase 1 – Ownership” proposal | Source: Snapshot Essentially, the proposal suggested that AAVE token holders should seek to take control of Aave’s brand assets. In this case, domains, social media accounts, and naming rights would be placed under a DAO‑controlled structure to be defined later, with safeguards to prevent misuse or takeover. It called on whoever currently controls those assets to transfer them in both principle and practice, regardless of their identity. Many investors criticized the proposal for being made “in a rush” during ongoing discussions about Aave Labs’ actions and communication strategy, close to popular international holidays. This governance dispute has now consolidated as one of the most significant for a DeFi protocol, offering long-term lessons and setting relevant precedents for DAO voting going forward. Notably, the proposal stemmed from escalating tensions over revenue distribution and control of AAVE $155.0 24h volatility: 2.1% Market cap: $2.35 B Vol. 24h: $310.78 M off-chain assets. The controversy ignited earlier in December when governance delegates discovered that Aave Labs’ integration of CoW Swap into the official app.aave.com frontend had redirected swap fees (estimated at up to $10 million annually) from the DAO treasury to a wallet controlled by Aave Labs. Previously, the ParaSwap integration shared such revenues with the DAO, fueling accusations of “stealth privatization” and misalignment between the private development entity and token holders. Aave-Related Leaderships Comment on Recent DAO Record Vote As the vote wrapped up, Aave Labs founder and CEO Stani Kulechov commented on it on X. He said it was “a productive discussion that’s essential for the long-term health of Aave.” In the post, Stani pledged commitment to making the economic alignment between Aave Labs and $AAVE token holders clearer. Additionally, he expanded on his recently disclosed $15 million AAVE purchase, as Coinspeaker reported pre-holidays. He explained the amount was not used for this recent vote. “This is my life’s work,” Stani said, “I am putting my own capital behind my conviction.” Stani was the leader behind this proposal and a “YES” advocate. The recent DAO vote has wrapped up, and it has raised important questions about the relationship between Aave Labs and $AAVE token holders. This is a productive discussion that’s essential for the long-term health of Aave. While it's been a bit hectic, debate and disagreement… — Stani.eth (@StaniKulechov) December 26, 2025 Aavechan Initiative founder Marc “Billy” Zeller was one of the leading advocates for “ABSTAIN” votes in public discussions. He suggested that token holders abstain because the conditions were not ideal for making such an essential decision while discussions were still ongoing. He pointed out “a compressed timeline, a holiday period, and a debate that was still actively evolving.” Yet, in an X article published just a few minutes before Stani’s post above, Zeller highlighted the “massive” turnout of 1.8 million AAVE used by voters, claiming “DeFi will win.” “Despite an unfair timeline and every practical disadvantage stacked against the DAO, participation broke records, with 1,8M total voting power expressed. That is not a defeat for decentralization. It is the opposite of apathy, and that is exactly what a healthy DAO should look like,” he said. https://t.co/yKegmUERIn — Marc ”七十 Billy” Zeller (@Marczeller) December 26, 2025 Another prominent figure who commented on this governance proposal was Wintermute’s co-founder and CEO, Evgeny Gaevoy, a disclosed AAVE investor. Gaevoy highlighted “a clear expectation mismatch between AAVE Labs and a significant number of AAVE token holders” in many areas. Also, he disagreed with the forum proposal “as it stands now,” explaining it requires further elaboration to become feasible. Therefore, Wintermute and Evgeny Gaevoy voted and advocated for “NO,” the winning outcome. “It makes no sense to commit to a course of action without knowing the specifics. It’s far from obvious how the entity owning the front end and brand would be governed, whether it would be for profit or not, and whether it would actually guarantee value accrual to token holders.” Disclosures first (as should be customary). Wintermute (ventures) has been an investor in AAVE since 2022. We also have participated in governance and it is a decent part of our venture portfolio. I personally hold AAVE as well. Neither me personally, nor Wintermute have exposure… — wishful_cynic (@EvgenyGaevoy) December 25, 2025 Interestingly, on the same day of this reported proposal being refused, another relevant Ethereum DeFi protocol, Uniswap, approved a long-awaited governance proposal. On Dec. 25, the DAO voted in favor of the UNIfication overhaul, approving 100 million UNI Burn and activating the fee switch. next Vini Barbosa has covered the crypto industry professionally since 2020, summing up to over 10,000 hours of research, writing, and editing related content for media outlets and key industry players. Vini is an active commentator and a heavy user of the technology, truly believing in its revolutionary potential. Topics of interest include blockchain, open-source software, decentralized finance, and real-world utility. Vini Barbosa on X Share: