Zcash News Update: Buterin: Token-Based Voting Threatens Zcash’s Commitment to Privacy
- Vitalik Buterin warns Zcash against token-based governance, citing risks of privacy erosion and whale dominance over civil liberties. - Grayscale seeks to list Zcash ETF (ZCSH) via S-3 filing, potentially creating first U.S. privacy-focused crypto ETF with $196M assets under management. - Zcash’s price surged over 500% in two months amid governance debates, highlighting tension between privacy mission and market-driven governance models. - Buterin’s critique aligns with EU/US regulatory pressures on priv
Vitalik Buterin Warns Zcash Community on Token-Based Governance
Vitalik Buterin, one of the minds behind Ethereum, has cautioned the Zcash (ZEC) community against implementing governance systems that rely on token holdings. He believes that such models tend to favor short-term price movements at the expense of safeguarding privacy and civil rights in the long run. Sharing his perspective on X on November 30, Buterin expressed concerns about the dangers of secret vote purchasing, the concentration of power among large holders, and the diminishing influence of smaller stakeholders in the decision-making process.
This warning comes as Zcash experiences renewed interest, with its value soaring over 500% in the last two months. The community is currently considering significant changes to its governance structure, including how its Community Grants Committee is chosen.
Grayscale's ETF Ambitions Put Zcash in the Spotlight
Adding to the attention, Grayscale has recently applied to transform its Zcash Trust into an exchange-traded fund (ETF). The company has filed a Form S-3 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), seeking approval to list the Zcash Trust shares on NYSE Arca under the ticker ZCSH. If successful, this would be the first ETF in the U.S. dedicated to a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, giving investors regulated access to Zcash’s blockchain, which supports optional transaction transparency. Since its inception in 2021, Grayscale’s Zcash Trust has managed around $196 million in assets. However, the company has pointed to ongoing regulatory uncertainty as a challenge to enabling in-kind share creation and redemption.
Debate Over Governance Models Intensifies
Buterin’s criticism of token-based voting echoes ongoing discussions within the Zcash community. Supporters of governance weighted by token ownership argue that market forces ensure accountability, as price fluctuations and shifts in influence reflect community sentiment. On the other hand, critics—Buterin among them—warn that such systems can lead to plutocracy and undermine the project’s privacy-oriented ethos.
Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius and a Zcash advocate, has pointed out that while static committees lack the adaptive feedback of market-driven models, token-based voting is not without its own shortcomings. Meanwhile, Zcash’s price has skyrocketed over 1,000% in the past three months, peaking at $723 before settling at $448, signaling heightened interest from both institutional and retail investors.
Balancing Privacy and Market Growth
The ongoing governance debate highlights the challenge of staying true to Zcash’s founding mission of privacy protection while adapting to the realities of a growing market. Buterin has stressed that privacy can be compromised if governance is left to the average token holder, who may be more concerned with immediate profits than with defending civil liberties. His viewpoint aligns with broader regulatory scrutiny of privacy technologies, as demonstrated by the EU’s Chat Control initiative and U.S. enforcement actions against projects like Tornado Cash.
As Zcash faces these pivotal issues, the results of Grayscale’s ETF proposal and the community’s governance decisions will play a crucial role in determining its future. Striking a balance between innovation and the project’s core privacy values will be essential for attracting institutional interest and maintaining relevance in the fast-changing world of cryptocurrency.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Economic Impact of Incorporating AI in Sectors Driven by Data
- Global AI infrastructure investments by tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft are projected to reach $315B in 2025, generating $15T in economic value by 2030 through automation and analytics. - The U.S. leads with $470B in AI infrastructure funding (2013-2024), driven by cloud expansion expected to hit $3.4T by 2040, creating fragmented markets for consolidation. - Data-centric ecosystems (e.g., JHU, ICP Caffeine AI) enable pharmaceuticals and finance firms to build competitive barriers via proprietary

Internet Computer (ICP) Price Rally: Business and Academic Integration Driving Growth
Solana's Abrupt Plunge: Is This a Warning Sign for Cryptocurrency Traders?
- Solana's 2025 crash saw 11% price drop to $125.94 amid $19B liquidation, exposing systemic risks in high-speed blockchain ecosystems. - Technical vulnerabilities like centralized validator sets and thin liquidity amplified volatility, contrasting with Bitcoin/Ethereum's resilient infrastructure. - Governance flaws including token distribution bottlenecks and speculative attacks highlighted Solana's susceptibility to sudden supply shocks. - Macroeconomic pressures and leveraged positions triggered cascadi

The Federal Reserve's Change in Policy and Its Growing Influence on Cryptocurrencies Such as Solana
- Fed's 2025 policy shift (rate cuts, halted QT) boosted crypto liquidity but amplified altcoin volatility, particularly for Solana (SOL). - Solana's 14% late-2025 price correction highlighted altcoin fragility amid macro uncertainty, despite regulatory clarity and institutional adoption growth. - GENIUS Act's stablecoin reserves mandate and Solana's technical advantages drove $11B stablecoin expansion, linking macro policy to on-chain activity. - Future crypto resilience depends on Fed easing pace and ext
