Bitcoin, Ether Maintain Their 2023 Decoupling from Traditional Finance
As bitcoin and ether assert themselves as uncorrelated assets, the impact of macroeconomic catalysts has waned
If there’s one market development that may be more surprising than bitcoin’s 2023 performance, it may be its decoupling from traditional finance. Its independence from traditional finance arguably comes with both smiles and regrets.
Some investors are likely smiling over bitcoin's ability to weather macro noise, but others may be rueing its lack of participation in the periodic upsides that accompany upbeat events.
As bitcoin investors find comfort in its emergence as a non-correlated asset, they’ve also had to watch as it reacts less to global macro catalysts than its Tradfi counterparts.
Bitcoin’s correlation coefficient with the SP 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), and Nasdaq Composite has declined 50.5%, 30%, and 49.4% respectively since Jan. 1. Correlation coefficients range from -1 to 1, with the former indicating an inverse pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a direct one.
To be sure, digital asset news has been anything but non-eventful. There have been regulatory overhangs, unfounded rumors of SEC resignations, and speculation around Federal Reserve policy decisions. But outside of its reaction to BlackRock’s ETF announcement on June 15, BTC price action has been relatively lax.
Read More:
Until a surge above $31,7000 late Thursday – BTC’s first time above that level in a year – bitcoin had been immersed in a three-week bout of range-bound trading and volatility compression. The same has held true for ether, as investors in both assets grew content to sit on 2023 gains, while awaiting a fresh price catalyst.
At the moment, it appears that macroeconomic catalysts that move markets in general are having a lesser effect on bitcoin. Meanwhile, the decoupling hasn’t been limited to just equities.
BTC’s correlation with gold and the U.S. dollar is 0.33 and -0.23, respectively. The proximity to zero for both implies no pricing relationship at all, ironic given early perceptions of bitcoin as an inflation hedge.
Bitcoin’s most consistently positive pricing relationship has been with ether. Despite the differences in the two assets’ utility and consensus mechanism, they have traded in relative lockstep.
Bitcoin and ether’s independence hint at the maturation of the two assets, with sharp moves directly attributable to asset-specific developments.
The lack of reaction from both to Wednesday’s solid inflation report suggests that most of their investors are attempting to sift through the noise. Meanwhile, they appear to be engaging in quiet accumulation rather than rampant speculation.
Since Jan. 1, the number of bitcoin addresses with a non-zero balance has increased by approximately 9%, according to on-chain analytics firm . For ether, unique addresses with a non-zero balance increased 11% over the same period.
For bitcoin, the figure continued to rise even as prices declined to $25,000 in May, indicating an underpinning of stable demand despite the downturns.
This article was written and edited by CoinDesk journalists with the sole purpose of informing the reader with accurate information. If you click on a link from Glassnode, CoinDesk may earn a commission. For more, see our .
Edited by James Rubin.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
COAI's Unexpected Price Decline: Key Lessons for Investors on Misinformation Threats in the Technology Sector
- COAI Index's 96% November 2025 crash exposed fragility of AI-driven crypto markets amid governance failures and regulatory ambiguity. - Disinformation frameworks amplified panic through AI-generated deepfakes, while low media literacy enabled viral misinformation to destabilize investor behavior. - Governance gaps like C3.ai's $116M loss, leadership instability, and token centralization (87.9% in ten wallets) eroded trust in COAI's oversight mechanisms. - Lessons emphasize systemic risks from AI misinfor
Leveraging New EdTech Developments in STEM Education and Digital Skills Training
- Global EdTech market hit $169.2B in 2024, projected to reach $200.86B in 2025 at 18.7% CAGR, driven by STEM/digital skills demand. - AI personalization (60% educator adoption by 2026) and VR/AR immersion (40% K-12 STEM adoption) are reshaping learning efficiency and practical training. - Microlearning (5-10 min modules) and gamification boost engagement, while blockchain credentialing (70% university adoption by 2027) addresses verification challenges. - Strategic investment areas include AI-driven STEM

ZEC Falls by 2.16% as Traders Adjust Short Positions During Market Fluctuations
- ZEC fell 2.16% to $352.42 on Dec 6, 2025, despite a 526.09% annual gain, highlighting its extreme volatility. - Hyperliquid's $14.1M ZEC short position, averaging $412 entry, shows shrinking profits as prices rise toward breakeven. - Broader bearish activity includes ETH and MON shorts with $6.22M and $2.26M unrealized gains, reflecting active market positioning. - Traders adjust exposure amid ZEC's 17.68% monthly drop and 2.43% weekly rise, signaling cautious strategy shifts in volatile crypto markets.
The Growing Popularity of Momentum ETFs Amid Market Volatility: Tactical Portfolio Allocation and Optimizing Risk-Adjusted Performance in 2025
- Momentum ETFs surged 74.8% in 2023 and 72.7% in 2024 but faced a 4.3% average loss in 2025 amid volatility and macroeconomic uncertainty. - Quality/value ETFs like QUAL and AVUV showed greater resilience during downturns, contrasting momentum strategies' lack of defensive characteristics. - 2025 market shifts highlighted risks of overvaluation in momentum sectors, with tech indices diverging from economic fundamentals. - Strategic diversification through hedging (VIXY/UVXY), alternative assets (VTIP), an

