Minaの‌価格MINA

Why I’m bearish on $MINA 👇 HTF structure still bearish Price tapping into 1D bearish order block Buyside liquidity at $0.0803 Previous week high NOT reclaimed Liquidity magnet → Prev week low Entry: $0.0812 | SL: $0.0857 | TPs: $0.0750/$0.0725 Plan: Wait for OB tap + LTF rejection → execute short

$MINA long liquidation at $0.0776 flushed emotional entries and pushed price back into a value area. These resets often clean the chart and reduce downside pressure. Selling momentum is fading, which increases the chance of a technical rebound. EP: $0.0776 – $0.0755 TP: $0.0812 → $0.0856 → $0.0918 SL: $0.0729 Let price confirm strength before scaling. Trade smart with $MINA

New privacy architectures are explicitly separating validity from visibility. A transaction can be valid without being globally observable. A user can be compliant without exposing raw identity. Auditability is becoming conditional rather than permanent. Instead of asking what should be private, systems are now asking where disclosure should live. This shift is becoming increasingly visible across the ecosystem, with different approaches emerging to address how privacy is implemented, maintained, and scaled. The current privacy landscape is organized into three distinct design categories, each optimizing for specific aspects of privacy and compliance: ➣ MPC-Native Privacy & Confidential Execution Some systems reduce disclosure by splitting trust. Here, execution completes, but no single party ever sees full context. - @nillion: decentralized secure computation for private data and AI workloads without data reconstruction - @Arcium: MPC-based confidential computation for onchain and offchain workflows - @partisiampc: MPC-native L1 for private smart contracts - @FireblocksHQ: institutional MPC custody and transaction signing - @ZenGo: consumer MPC wallet with keyless recovery - @LitProtocol: threshold cryptography for access control, signing, and private data coordination - @renegade_fi: MPC-powered private order matching and trading - @COTInetwork: MPC-based privacy layer for payments and enterprise transactions ➣ ZK Identity & Selective Disclosure Other systems eliminate disclosure by removing identity from execution. These systems prove what’s required, not who the user is. - @Worldcoin: proof-of-personhood without persistent identity - @zkPass: private KYC and data verification via ZK proofs - @PrivadoID: ZK credentials for identity and access control - @MinaProtocol: succinct proofs enabling private verification - @SuccinctLabs: ZK proof generation and verification infrastructure - @Sismo_eth: anonymous reputation and group membership proofs ➣ Where Privacy Is the Execution Layer A third approach removes disclosure decisions from applications. Computation runs on encrypted state. Visibility is opt-in. - @aztecnetwork: ZK privacy rollup for DeFi and payments - @zcash: shielded transactions with optional transparency - @AleoHQ: ZK-first L1 for private applications - @SecretNetwork: encrypted smart contract state - @oasisprotocol: confidential compute at the execution layer - @horizenglobal: privacy-first execution and secure sidechains - @firoorg: private transaction execution with protocol-level anonymity ● How These Systems Actually Differ These systems are not competing on ideology. They are sorting along a single axis: where disclosure is enforced. At trust coordination. At identity and eligibility. Or inside execution itself. That placement determines composability ceilings, audit paths, regulatory touchpoints, and trust assumptions. ● Conclusion Privacy and compliance are no longer opposites. They are design variables. The important systems will not be those that hide everything or reveal everything. They will be the ones that decide, precisely and mechanically, when disclosure is required and where it is enforced. That is not a feature. That is architecture.

$MINA USDT — 2H Technical Analysis (Based on Chart) Market Structure Overall structure shows a downtrend → base formation. Price is holding a key demand zone around 0.088–0.090, which is acting as major support. Recent candles suggest a potential short-term trend reversal if support holds. Key Levels Support 0.0880 – 0.0900 (critical demand zone) 0.0850 (last defense) Resistance / Targets 0.0950 (first reaction level) 0.1020 0.1100 (major upside target shown on chart) Indicators (2H) RSI: Recovering from oversold → bullish divergence likely forming. Structure: Higher low attempt from support = bullish signal. Volume: Needs expansion on breakout above 0.095 for confirmation. Trade Scenarios Bullish Scenario (Preferred) Hold above 0.088–0.090 Break & close above 0.095 Targets: 0.102 → 0.110 Momentum continuation likely if structure flips bullish Bearish Scenario Clean breakdown below 0.088 Downside risk toward 0.085 → 0.082 Bias flips bearish if support fails Conclusion As long as 0.088 support holds, buyers remain in control and a relief rally toward 0.11 is technically valid. This is a high-risk / high-reward zone, so confirmation is key. I