Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Automattic submits counterclaims against WP Engine in the WordPress legal case, accusing them of improper use of trademarks

Automattic submits counterclaims against WP Engine in the WordPress legal case, accusing them of improper use of trademarks

Bitget-RWA2025/10/24 16:27
By:Bitget-RWA

On Friday, Automattic, the company behind WordPress, submitted its counterclaims in response to the lawsuit brought by hosting provider WP Engine in October 2024. WP Engine had accused Automattic and its CEO, Matt Mullenweg, of defamation and misuse of authority. Automattic asserts that WP Engine has misused the WordPress trademark and engaged in misleading marketing tactics, all while failing to contribute meaningfully to the open source community.

Because of these concerns, Automattic took steps against WP Engine last year, which included labeling the host as a “cancer to WordPress” and issuing a cease-and-desist notice for violating trademark policies. As the dispute escalated, Automattic blocked WP Engine from accessing WordPress.org resources and tried to arrange a licensing agreement with the company. According to Automattic, WP Engine stalled the process and negotiated without genuine intent.

WP Engine later filed a lawsuit against Automattic, presenting itself as the target of Mullenweg’s criticism. However, Automattic’s version of events claims that after Silver Lake, a private equity firm, invested $250 million in WP Engine, the company shifted from fair use to trademark infringement by branding itself as “The WordPress Technology Company” and allowing partners to refer to it as “WordPress Engine.”

Automattic further points out that WP Engine introduced products with names such as “Core WordPress” and “Headless WordPress,” and told its clients it had dedicated 5% of its resources to the WordPress ecosystem. Automattic contends these commitments were never fulfilled. The company also alleges that WP Engine’s trademark violations were intentional, claiming the host only “pretended to participate in licensing talks, but actually stalled and bargained in bad faith.”

Silver Lake is highlighted as a key figure in the counterclaims, which suggest that the private equity firm’s interests heavily influenced WP Engine’s actions. Specifically, the counterclaims state that WP Engine violated trademarks because paying for licenses would reduce its profits and valuation, affecting Silver Lake’s anticipated returns.

The counterclaims further state that Silver Lake attempted to sell WP Engine at a $2 billion valuation, but was unable to secure a buyer. The filing notably mentions that these efforts included “approaches to Automattic.”

Automattic also alleges that, in an effort to reduce expenses, WP Engine diminished user experience and product standards by removing important features during this period.

The dispute between WordPress and WP Engine, clarified
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

ICP Network's Swift Expansion: Could It Revolutionize Decentralized Infrastructure?

- ICP Network's 2025 growth stems from AI-powered Caffeine platform and Chain Fusion cross-chain protocol, challenging Ethereum/Solana with on-chain AI execution and hybrid cloud partnerships. - Institutional adoption via Microsoft/Azure partnerships and UN projects boosts ICP's enterprise appeal, while tokenized BTC and IoT applications expand real-world use cases. - Despite 1.2M active wallets and $1.14B daily transactions, dApp engagement dropped 22.4%, revealing gaps between infrastructure development

Bitget-RWA2025/12/07 21:02
ICP Network's Swift Expansion: Could It Revolutionize Decentralized Infrastructure?

The Enduring Fundamentals of Value Investing Amid Market Volatility

- McNeel and Buffett's value investing principles emphasize intrinsic value, emotional discipline, and long-term optimism as timeless tools for volatile markets. - The 2025 crypto market's speculative frenzies and social media-driven volatility mirror McNeel's warnings about hype-driven mispricings and overreaching investments. - Emotional discipline through techniques like dollar-cost averaging and staying within one's "circle of competence" helps investors avoid FOMO-driven mistakes and compounding losse

Bitget-RWA2025/12/07 21:02
The Enduring Fundamentals of Value Investing Amid Market Volatility

The Rise in Astar (ASTR) Value: Key Drivers, Potential Risks, and Optimal Timing for Investment

- Astar (ASTR) price surged due to blockchain upgrades enabling 150,000 TPS and institutional adoption via $3.16M purchases. - Strategic partnerships with Sony , Animoca, and Japan Airlines expanded ASTR's real-world utility beyond speculation. - Bitcoin's Q4 2025 rebound and spot ETF approvals drove macro crypto sentiment, though ASTR lags in recovery. - Deflationary tokenomics and 2027/2030 price targets highlight long-term potential amid regulatory and volatility risks.

Bitget-RWA2025/12/07 21:02
The Rise in Astar (ASTR) Value: Key Drivers, Potential Risks, and Optimal Timing for Investment

Zcash's Strength in the Face of Regulatory Challenges: An Investment Perspective Focused on Privacy

- Zcash (ZEC) surged 1,100% in 2023-2025, defying global privacy-coin crackdowns through optional zk-SNARKs and audit-friendly design. - Regulatory bans in EU/Asia and U.S. mixer rules contrast with Zcash's "compliant privacy" model, attracting institutional adoption like Grayscale's ETF filing. - ZEC's $1.6B market cap growth (2025) highlights privacy demand amid CBDC concerns, though 57% post-peak volatility reflects regulatory uncertainty. - Projections of $563.91 (2025) to $1,270.96 (2028) depend on Zc

Bitget-RWA2025/12/07 21:02
Zcash's Strength in the Face of Regulatory Challenges: An Investment Perspective Focused on Privacy
© 2025 Bitget