Written by: Sleepy.txt
Edited by: Jack
October 21, Washington, D.C. The meeting room at the Federal Reserve headquarters was packed with people who, just a few years ago, were considered troublemakers in the financial system.
The founder of Chainlink, the president of Circle, the CFO of Coinbase, and the COO of BlackRock sat face-to-face with Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller, discussing stablecoins, tokenization, and AI payments.
This was the first time the Federal Reserve held a payments innovation conference. The meeting was not open to the public, but it was broadcast live. The agenda listed four topics: the integration of traditional finance and digital assets, stablecoin business models, the application of AI in payments, and tokenized products. Behind each topic lies a market worth trillions of dollars.
Waller said at the opening, "This is a new era for the Federal Reserve in the field of payments. The DeFi industry is no longer viewed with suspicion or ridicule." After this statement spread in the crypto community, bitcoin rose by 2% that day. In his opening remarks, Waller also said, "Payment innovation is developing rapidly, and the Federal Reserve needs to keep up."
This payments innovation conference featured four roundtable discussions. Beating summarized the content, and the following are the core topics and content of the conference:
The Federal Reserve's "Slimmed-Down Master Account"
The most important thing Waller proposed was a concept called the "streamlined master account."
The Federal Reserve's master account is a pass for banks to access the Fed's payment system. With this account, banks can directly use payment rails like Fedwire and FedNow without intermediaries. But the threshold for a master account is high, and the approval process is lengthy; many crypto companies have applied for years without success.
Custodia Bank is a typical case. This Wyoming-based crypto bank began applying for a master account in 2020, was delayed by the Fed for more than two years, and eventually took the Fed to court. Kraken has faced similar issues.
Waller said that many payment companies do not need all the functions of a master account. They do not need to borrow from the Fed or have intraday overdrafts; they just need access to the payment system. Therefore, the Fed is studying a "streamlined version" to provide these companies with basic payment services while controlling risk.
Specifically, this account would not pay interest, might have a balance cap, cannot be overdrawn, and cannot borrow, but its approval process would be much faster.
Federal Reserve Governor Waller
What does this proposal mean? Stablecoin issuers and crypto payment companies could directly access the Fed's payment system without relying on traditional banks.
This would significantly reduce costs and improve efficiency. More importantly, this is the first time the Fed has formally recognized these companies as legitimate financial institutions.
Dialogue One: Traditional Finance Meets Digital Ecosystem
The first panel discussion focused on "the integration of traditional finance and the digital asset ecosystem." The moderator was Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer of Jito Labs. On stage were Sergey Nazarov, co-founder of Chainlink; Jackie Reses, CEO of Lead Bank; Michael Shaulov, CEO of Fireblocks; and Jennifer Barker, Global Head of Treasury Services and Depositary Receipts at BNY Mellon.
From left to right: Rebecca Rettig, Chief Legal Officer of Jito Labs; Sergey Nazarov, co-founder of Chainlink; Jackie Reses, CEO of Lead Bank; Michael Shaulov, CEO of Fireblocks; Jennifer Barker, Global Head of Treasury Services and Depositary Receipts at BNY Mellon
Interoperability Is the Biggest Obstacle to Integration
Chainlink co-founder Nazarov got straight to the point: the biggest issue now is interoperability. There is a lack of unified compliance standards, identity verification mechanisms, and accounting frameworks between blockchain assets and traditional financial systems. As the cost of creating new chains decreases, the "fragmentation" of chains is intensifying, making the need for unified standards even more urgent.
He called on the Fed to ensure that payment systems can interoperate with stablecoins and tokenized deposits. He stated that the payments sector represents the buy side of the digital asset economy, and if the Fed can provide a clear risk management framework, the U.S. can maintain its lead in global digital payment innovation.
He pointed out that a year ago, it was unimaginable to discuss "regulated DeFi" at the Fed, which itself marks a positive trend. Nazarov predicted that in the next 2 to 5 years, a hybrid model will emerge: a "Regulated DeFi Variant," where compliance processes are automated via smart contracts.
Traditional Banks Are Not Ready; The Core Bottleneck Is Cognition and Talent
Lead Bank CEO Reses believes that even with a blueprint for integrating traditional finance and the digital ecosystem, most banks are simply not prepared to handle such integration. Traditional banks lack wallet infrastructure, systems for crypto deposits and withdrawals, and, more importantly, "talent who understands blockchain products" internally.
She further summarized the problem as a gap in cognition and capability, emphasizing that the biggest obstacle is not the technology itself but "the knowledge and execution ability of the bank's core financial services team." These core teams, lacking the ability to understand and judge emerging blockchain products, simply do not know how to effectively regulate or supervise these new businesses.
This lack of preparedness is especially evident on the retail side. Reses mentioned that while KYC systems for institutions are now relatively mature, retail users still have difficulty accessing these tools. This exposes an awkward reality: even if banks want to participate, their service capabilities are limited to a few institutional clients, and large-scale adoption is still far off.
The Industry Needs Pragmatic Regulatory and Risk Control Frameworks
This discussion also touched on the issue of AI fraud, leading to a debate on the "reversibility" of on-chain transactions. Traditional wire transfers can be reversed, but blockchain transactions are final. How to meet regulatory requirements for reversible processes while maintaining on-chain finality is a severe challenge. Reses called on regulators to "move slowly and steadily," because "innovation is always great until your own family gets scammed."
Fireblocks CEO Michael Shaulov took the discussion deeper into economic and regulatory issues. He pointed out that stablecoins could reshape the credit market and thus affect the Fed's monetary policy. He also highlighted a specific regulatory gray area: when banks place "tokenized deposits" on public blockchains, the bank's responsibilities are still unclear, which is a key issue hindering bank projects. He called for further research on how digital assets change banks' balance sheets and the Fed's role in this.
Finally, Jennifer Barker from BNY Mellon provided a "wish list" of four priorities that traditional banks hope regulators will address: enabling 24/7 payment systems, setting technical standards, strengthening fraud detection, and establishing liquidity and redemption frameworks for stablecoins and tokenized deposits.
Dialogue Two: Stablecoins—Troubles and Opportunities
The second panel focused on stablecoins. The moderator was Kyle Samani, co-founder of Multicoin Capital. On stage were Charles Cascarilla, CEO of Paxos; Heath Tarbert, Chairman of Circle; Tim Spence, CEO of Fifth Third Bank; and Fernando Tres, CEO of DolarApp.
From left to right: Kyle Samani, co-founder of Multicoin Capital; Charles Cascarilla, CEO of Paxos; Tim Spence, CEO of Fifth Third Bank; Fernando Tres, CEO of DolarApp; Heath Tarbert, Chairman of Circle
Strong Demand and Use Cases for Compliant Stablecoins
In July this year, the U.S. passed the GENIUS Act, requiring stablecoin issuers to hold 100% high-quality reserve assets, mainly cash and short-term U.S. Treasuries.
After the act took effect, the share of compliant stablecoins rose from less than 50% at the beginning of the year to 72%. Among them, Circle and Paxos are the biggest beneficiaries. USDC's circulation reached $65 billion in Q2 this year, accounting for 28% of the global market, with an annual growth rate of over 40%.
In terms of use cases, Spence, representing banks, gave the most pragmatic view. He believes the strongest and most direct use case for stablecoins is "cross-border payments," as it truly solves the pain points of traditional settlement delays and FX risk. In contrast, programmability for AI agent commerce is a more distant future.
Tres from DolarApp added a Latin American perspective, noting that for countries with unstable local currencies, stablecoins are not speculative tools but essential means of preserving value, reminding the U.S.-centric decision-makers present that the application scenarios for stablecoins are much broader than they imagine.
The "Dial-Up Internet" Experience Bottleneck
Cascarilla pointed out the industry's biggest growth pain: user experience.
He compared current DeFi and cryptocurrencies to the early days of "dial-up internet," bluntly stating that DeFi and crypto have not yet been sufficiently abstracted.
He believes that only when blockchain technology is well abstracted and becomes "invisible" will mass adoption occur. "No one knows how a mobile phone works... but everyone knows how to use it. Crypto, blockchain, and stablecoins need to be like that."
Cascarilla praised companies like PayPal, saying that their integration of stablecoins into traditional finance is an early sign of this usability transformation.
The Threat to the Banking Credit System
Circle's Tarbert and Fifth Third Bank's Spence also participated in the discussion, and their presence as representatives of traditional banks is itself a signal.
Spence first tried to reshape the identity of banks, proposing to use "ScaledFi" (scaled finance) instead of "TradFi" (traditional finance), and said that banks' "old" identity "is the least interesting thing."
He also pointed out that stablecoins will not drain banks' "capital," but will drain "deposits." The real threat is that if stablecoins are allowed to pay interest (even disguised as "rewards" like Coinbase's USDC subsidies), it will pose a major threat to the formation of bank credit.
The core function of banks is to absorb deposits and make loans (i.e., credit creation). If stablecoins, with their flexibility and potential interest, siphon off large amounts of deposits, banks' lending capacity will shrink, threatening the entire economy's credit system. This is similar to the impact early money market mutual funds (MMMFs) had on the banking system.
Dialogue Three: AI—Imagination and Reality
The third panel focused on AI. The moderator was Matt Marcus, CEO of Modern Treasury. On stage were Cathie Wood, CEO of ARK Invest; Alesia Haas, CFO of Coinbase; Emily Sands, Head of AI at Stripe; and Richard Widmann, Web3 Strategy Lead at Google Cloud.
AI Is Ushering in the Era of "Agent Commerce"
Cathie Wood predicted that AI-driven "agent payment systems," where AI shifts from "knowing" to "doing" and can autonomously make financial decisions for users (such as paying bills, shopping, investing), will bring a huge productivity boost. She asserted, "We believe that with such breakthroughs and productivity releases, real GDP growth over the next five years could accelerate to 7% or higher."
ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood
Additionally, Wood named AI and blockchain as the two most important platforms driving this wave of productivity. She reflected on U.S. regulation, believing that early hostility to blockchain was a blessing in disguise, forcing policymakers to rethink and sounding the alarm for the U.S. to reclaim leadership in the "next-generation internet."
Emily Sands from Stripe emphasized from a practical perspective that while AI agent shopping (such as one-click checkout via ChatGPT) is already happening, mitigating fraud risk remains "one of the most pressing challenges." Merchants must clearly define how their systems interact with these AI agents to prevent new types of fraud.
In terms of improving financial efficiency, AI's results are also remarkable. Alesia Haas from Coinbase said that by the end of the year, half of Coinbase's code will be written by AI bots, nearly doubling R&D productivity. In financial reconciliation, reconciling crypto transactions can be done by one person in half a day, while reconciling an equivalent amount of fiat transactions requires 15 people over three days, showing how AI and crypto technology greatly reduce operational costs.
Stablecoins Are the New Financial Infrastructure Urgently Needed by AI Agents
The second consensus in the discussion was that AI agents need a new, native financial tool, and stablecoins are the natural solution.
Richard Widmann from Google Cloud explained that AI agents cannot open traditional bank accounts like humans, but they can have crypto wallets. Stablecoins provide a perfect solution, offering programmability and being particularly suitable for AI-driven automated microtransactions (such as two-cent payments) and machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements.
Alesia Haas from Coinbase added that the programmability of stablecoins and the increasingly clear regulatory environment make them an ideal choice for AI-driven transactions. The extremely fast monetization speed of AI companies (ARR growth is 3-4 times that of SaaS companies) also requires payment infrastructure to integrate new payment methods like stablecoins.
At the same time, stablecoins and blockchain technology provide new anti-fraud tools, such as using on-chain transaction visibility to train AI fraud models, address whitelisting/blacklisting mechanisms, and transaction finality (merchants have no chargeback risk).
Dialogue Four: Everything On-Chain
The fourth panel focused on tokenized products. The moderator was Colleen Sullivan, Head of Venture at Brevan Howard Digital. On stage were Jenny Johnson, CEO of Franklin Templeton; Don Wilson, CEO of DRW; Rob Goldstein, COO of BlackRock; and Carla Kennedy, Co-Head of JPMorgan Kinexys.
From left to right: BHD's Colleen Sullivan; Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson; BlackRock COO Rob Goldstein; JPMorgan Kinexys Co-Head Carla Kennedy
On-Chain Traditional Financial Assets Are Only a Matter of Time
Participants unanimously agreed that asset tokenization is an irreversible trend. BlackRock COO Goldstein made the most direct statement: "It's not a question of if, but when." He noted that digital wallets already hold about $4.5 trillion, and as investors can directly hold tokenized stocks, bonds, and funds via blockchain, this number will continue to rise.
Wilson from DRW made a more specific prediction, believing that within five years, every frequently traded financial instrument will be traded on-chain. Johnson from Franklin Templeton compared this to historical technological revolutions, summarizing, "Technology adoption is always slower than people expect, then suddenly it takes off."
Tokenization is not a distant vision but an ongoing practice. Currently, traditional finance and digital assets are merging in both directions: traditional assets (such as stocks and treasuries) are being tokenized and used in DeFi, while digital assets (such as stablecoins and tokenized money market funds) are being integrated into traditional markets.
Institutions have long been actively deploying. Johnson revealed that Franklin Templeton has launched a native on-chain money market fund (MMF) that enables second-level intraday yield calculation. Kennedy introduced JPMorgan Kinexys's progress, including using tokenized U.S. Treasuries for minute-level overnight repo transactions and launching a proof of concept for the JPMD deposit token. Wilson also confirmed that DRW is participating in on-chain U.S. Treasury repo transactions.
Never Replicate the "Bad Practices" of Crypto Natives
Despite the broad prospects, traditional financial giants remain highly vigilant about risks. They emphasized that tokenized assets, stablecoins, and deposit tokens should not be interchangeable, and the market must assess different assets' collateral "haircuts" based on credit quality, liquidity, and transparency.
Goldstein from BlackRock warned that many so-called "tokens" are actually complex "structured products" in disguise, and not fully understanding these structures is dangerous.
Wilson from DRW sharply pointed out serious issues exposed by the recent crypto market flash crash (October 11): unreliable oracles and trading platforms conducting internal liquidations and suspending user deposits for profit, creating conflicts of interest.
He stated firmly that these are "bad practices" that traditional finance should not replicate before entering DeFi, and that strict infrastructure supervision and market quality standards must be established first. In addition, for compliance (AML/KYC) needs, regulated banks must use permissioned distributed ledgers (Permissioned DLT).
Racing Ahead in Digital Finance: Who Is Winning?
The signal from this conference is clear: the Federal Reserve no longer sees the crypto industry as a threat, but as a partner.
In the past year or two, global competition in digital currencies has intensified. The digital yuan has made rapid progress in cross-border payments, with transaction volume reaching $870 billion in 2024. The EU's MiCA regulations have come into effect, and Singapore and Hong Kong are also improving their crypto regulatory frameworks. The U.S. feels the pressure.
But U.S. policy is different. It does not promote a government-led central bank digital currency but embraces private sector innovation. The "Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act" passed this year explicitly prohibits the Fed from issuing a digital dollar. The U.S. logic is to let companies like Circle and Coinbase handle stablecoins, let BlackRock and JPMorgan handle tokenization, and have the government only set rules and regulate.
The most direct beneficiaries are compliant stablecoin issuers. Circle and Paxos have seen their valuations surge in recent months. Traditional financial institutions are also accelerating their deployments; JPMorgan's JPM Coin has processed over $300 billion in transactions. Citi and Wells Fargo are testing digital asset custody platforms.
Data shows that 46% of U.S. banks now offer crypto-related services to clients, up from just 18% three years ago. The market reaction is also clear. Since the Fed signaled regulatory easing in April, the stablecoin market has grown from just over $200 billion at the start of the year to $307 billion.
There are deep political and economic considerations behind this strategy. Central bank digital currencies mean direct government monitoring of every transaction, which is hard to accept in U.S. political culture. In contrast, privately issued stablecoins can maintain the dollar's global status while avoiding controversy over excessive government power.
But this strategy also carries risks. Private stablecoin issuers could form new monopolies, and their collapse could trigger systemic risks. How to balance encouraging innovation with preventing risk is the challenge facing U.S. regulators.
In his closing remarks, Waller said that consumers do not need to understand these technologies, but ensuring their safety and efficiency is everyone's responsibility. This may sound like official rhetoric, but the signal is clear: the Federal Reserve has decided to bring the crypto industry into the mainstream financial system.
This conference did not release any policy documents or make any decisions. But the signal it sent is more powerful than any official document. An era of dialogue has begun, and the era of confrontation has ended.
